• 540.434.0316
  • info@wawlaw.com
    OSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermark
    • Home
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    ✕
    Specialty Contractors
    Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable.
    February 8, 2020
    recording COVID 19 OSHA 300 log
    UPDATE – Recording COVID-19 Infections on OSHA 300 Logs
    April 12, 2020

    Forklifts & Selective Racking Systems. How Sturdy Does Your Racking System Need To Be?

    Published by Lucas I. Pangle on March 14, 2020
    Categories
    • OSHA Updates
    Tags
    pallet racks

    What you should know: The Commission will soon have occasion to consider the extent to which employers must ensure stored product remains stable upon accidental contact by forklifts. As things stand, employers should ensure that pallets and stacked product are able to withstand accidental “bumps” from powered industrial trucks. Moreover, employers should create work rules removing employees from the loading/unloading area.

    29 C.F.R. § 1910.176(b) (the “Materials Storage Rule”) is an awfully big rule. It is part of the Materials Handling standard, and states:

    Secure storage. Storage of material shall not create a hazard. Bags, containers, bundles, etc., stored in tiers shall be stacked, blocked, interlocked and limited in height so that they are stable and secure against sliding or collapse.

    OSHA uses Materials Storage Rule for just about anything: bent or displaced racking, falling materials, precariously stacked boxes, and so on. In practice, one might think of the Materials Storage Rule as effectively to codifying the General Duty Clause (29 U.S. Code § 654(a)(1)) for hazards related to material storage.

    The Racking System and the “Dynamic” Warehouse Atmosphere.

    Warehouses can be busy, “dynamic” places. When employees are near shaky or wobbly racking, OSHA takes the view that they are exposed to the hazards of falling or dislodged material. That is precisely the issue presented by the Walmart decision now on appeal to the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

    Walmart, along with most in the industry, uses a “selective racking” system for its pallet storage system. The selective racking system holds pallets on two orange beams (a front beam and a back beam), and stores the pallets as high as fifty feet.

    Walmart fills its orders through the combinatory efforts of employees on foot and powered industrial trucks. Powered industrial trucks bring merchandise to the desired aisle and place the merchandise in the proper slot. Employees on foot walk up and down the aisles, and remove items from the rack to fill orders.

    Occasionally, the driver operating the powered industrial truck moving merchandise bumps neighboring pallets—causing the pallet to shift and items to fall off the pallet. And, according to OSHA, that is exactly what happened when a can of crescent rolls became dislodged and struck an employee.

    OSHA cited Walmart for violating the Materials Storage Rule and Administrative Law Judge Bell affirmed the citation. The case is currently awaiting review by the Commission.

    Arguments to Watch On Appeal – Does the standard apply? Was it violated?

    With the Commission set to review the case, there are several arguments to keep an eye on – including a pair of arguments questioning whether the Materials Storage Standard was violated.

    Before ALJ Bell, Walmart argued that, if the dislodged material was only in the process of being stored, could that material be improperly stored? In other words, does the standard apply to material that is being transported or maneuvered to its eventual storage location? ALJ Bell rejected the argument because the crescent rolls that fell through the rack were on the rack prior to the accident.

    Second, Walmart argued the pallet was stable in the racking system, and would have remained so had it not been struck by another pallet. ALJ Bell cited a 1984 Commission case (Clement Food Co., 11 BNA OSHC 2120) to support his conclusion that material must be stable and secure even when struck by forklifts. Given that the pallets were constantly being placed and pulled from racks, and the pallets were larger than the selective racking system racks, ALJ Bell found that the evidence showed the racks became unstable when struck by moving equipment.

    In so finding, ALJ Bel relied upon the Clement Food Co. holding that stacked product must withstand the “shock or vibrations from forklift trucks and machinery in the area”.

    Arguments to Watch On Appeal – What about a “20 foot” Rule?

    In addition to its arguments that the Materials Storage Standard did not apply or was not violated, Walmart argued that it had “20-foot rule” that keeps employees away from forklifts loading and unloading pallets. The “20-foot rule” requires order fillers to stay 20 feet back when a driver honks their horn and yells “20 feet” while placing items in, or removing items from, the storage rack. The injured employee, according to Walmart, failed to follow the 20 foot rule when she was injured.

    Work rules (i.e. “administrative controls”) prohibiting employees from entering the “danger zone” are frequently used by employers in defense of OSHA citations. The idea is that by mandating employees stay away from a hazard, OSHA cannot show that employees are endangered by the hazard. But the argument is infrequently successful in court—mostly because employers have a hard time demonstrating that the rule is successful in preventing exposure. In the Walmart decision, ALJ Bell found the work rule completely ineffective: not only was a Walmart employee injured, but there was testimony that the “20-foot rule” was not always followed.

    Awaiting Resolution on Appeal.

    With the Commission back to work, we will await evaluation of these arguments by the Commission—especially to see if the Commission curtails ALJ Bell’s expansion of the Clement Food Co. case or gives greater weight to Walmart’s 20 foot rule.

    Share
    Lucas I. Pangle
    Lucas I. Pangle

    Related posts

    recording COVID 19 OSHA 300 log
    April 12, 2020

    UPDATE – Recording COVID-19 Infections on OSHA 300 Logs


    Read more
    Specialty Contractors
    February 8, 2020

    Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable.


    Read more
    Commission quorum
    January 22, 2020

    The Commission Regains Its Quorum.


    Read more

    Comments are closed.

    Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver Logo

    Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver

    100 S. Mason Street Harrisonburg, VA 22801

    Tel: 540.434.0316 Fax: 540.434.5502

    Attorney Advertising.

    This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

    Recent Posts

    • UPDATE – Recording COVID-19 Infections on OSHA 300 Logs April 12, 2020
    • Forklifts & Selective Racking Systems. How Sturdy Does Your Racking System Need To Be? March 14, 2020
    • Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable. February 8, 2020
    • The Commission Regains Its Quorum. January 22, 2020
    • Ninth Circuit Applies Kisor v. Wilkie, Clarifies Employer’s Obligation to Monitor Respiratory Hazards. January 12, 2020
    © 2019 Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver, PLC | Site configured by J. Brooke Chao Designs | Theme by MuffinGroup
        Manage Cookie Consent
        We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
        Functional Always active
        The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
        Preferences
        The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
        Statistics
        The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
        Marketing
        The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
        Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
        View preferences
        {title} {title} {title}