• 540.434.0316
  • info@wawlaw.com
    OSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermarkOSHA Law Firm Logo with Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver watermark
    • Home
    • Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    ✕
    Employer Obligation to Monitor Respiratory Hazards
    Ninth Circuit Applies Kisor v. Wilkie, Clarifies Employer’s Obligation to Monitor Respiratory Hazards.
    January 12, 2020
    Specialty Contractors
    Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable.
    February 8, 2020

    The Commission Regains Its Quorum.

    Published by Lucas I. Pangle on January 22, 2020
    Categories
    • OSHA Updates
    Tags
    Commission quorum

    What you should know: The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission has a full panel again. Because it now has a “quorum”, or the minimum number of commissioners needed to take official action, the Commission will begin working through the backlog of OSHA cases on its docket. This is good news for stakeholders in the OSHA enforcement scheme. The Commission provides helpful clarity, guidance, and interpretation—even when it rules against the employer—which enables employers to better understand their safety obligations.

    The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is up and running again. On January 9, 2020, the Senate confirmed the President Trump’s appointments of Cynthia Attwood and Amanda Wood Laihow to join Chairman James Sullivan, Jr. on the three-person panel.

    Because the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is established by statute (29 U.S.C. § 661), it may only act where permitted by statute. Its enabling statute states that “[f]or the purpose of carrying out its functions under this chapter, two members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum and official action can be taken only on the affirmative vote of at least two members.” Following Chairwoman Heather MacDougall’s resignation and the expiration of Ms. Attwood’s term—both in the spring of 2019—the Commission had only one member. Without requisite number of decision-makers, the Commission sat dormant, leaving cases undecided and in procedural limbo.

    Having last issued a decision in March of 2019, the Commission’s resumption of its decision-making function is welcome news. As of the publication of this entry, the Commission has quite a logjam: 23 cases have been directed for review and 2 cases have been remanded to it by United States Courts of Appeal. In fact, some of the cases pending review have been on the Commission’s docket for over four years! We have previously reviewed the two remanded cases: Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc. (remanded by the Ninth Circuit) and Coleman Hammons Constr. Co. Inc. (remanded by the Fifth Circuit).

    In anticipation of the Commission’s newly filled panel and the re-engagement of its decision-making mandate, we will summarize some of the more anticipated cases and be on the look-out for Commission decisions.

    Share
    Lucas I. Pangle
    Lucas I. Pangle

    Related posts

    recording COVID 19 OSHA 300 log
    April 12, 2020

    UPDATE – Recording COVID-19 Infections on OSHA 300 Logs


    Read more
    pallet racks
    March 14, 2020

    Forklifts & Selective Racking Systems. How Sturdy Does Your Racking System Need To Be?


    Read more
    Specialty Contractors
    February 8, 2020

    Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable.


    Read more

    Comments are closed.

    Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver Logo

    Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver

    100 S. Mason Street Harrisonburg, VA 22801

    Tel: 540.434.0316 Fax: 540.434.5502

    Attorney Advertising.

    This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

    Recent Posts

    • UPDATE – Recording COVID-19 Infections on OSHA 300 Logs April 12, 2020
    • Forklifts & Selective Racking Systems. How Sturdy Does Your Racking System Need To Be? March 14, 2020
    • Reliance on Specialty and Expert Contractors for OSHA Compliance Must Be Reasonable. February 8, 2020
    • The Commission Regains Its Quorum. January 22, 2020
    • Ninth Circuit Applies Kisor v. Wilkie, Clarifies Employer’s Obligation to Monitor Respiratory Hazards. January 12, 2020
    © 2019 Wharton Aldhizer & Weaver, PLC | Site configured by J. Brooke Chao Designs | Theme by MuffinGroup
        Manage Cookie Consent
        We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
        Functional Always active
        The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
        Preferences
        The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
        Statistics
        The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
        Marketing
        The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
        Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
        View preferences
        {title} {title} {title}